Python's configure misunderstand freebsd
Sevan Janiyan
venture37 at geeklan.co.uk
Wed Jun 3 01:09:12 UTC 2015
On 02/02/2015 14:07, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> On 3/02/2015 1:03 AM, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
>>
>>> On 2 февр. 2015 г., at 2:36, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> At FOSDEM I have been reported by Sevan (CCed) that the python's configure
>>> scripts thinks it is forbidden to have a lib named libpython2.so.X.Y on FreeBSD
>>> which is wrong.
>>>
>>> Here is a patch that fixes it on python2 unfortunatly as a result that means
>>> everything linked to libpython2.so.1 will need a bump. (same thing should be
>>> done for other pythons)
>>>
>>> I would prefer that you guys decides when how and so on to make that change
>>> happening.
>>>
>>> https://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/respect-the-libname-decided-by-upstream.diff
>>>
>>> I modified the configure script and not the configure.ac because the patch is
>>> not worth have to depend on autotools to regenerate the configure.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Since this is the explicit case for FreeBSD it would be nice to see what commit log for that change in Python's repo was.
>>
>
> For reference:
>
> https://hg.python.org/cpython/diff/6fc10306bf31/configure
> http://bugs.python.org/issue1044395
>
> ./koobs
>
Hi Guys,
Any luck with this? was just digging into Python 2.7.10 for a unrelated
manner and noticed the change is still there to trim the library name.
Sevan
More information about the freebsd-python
mailing list