incorrect dependency registration?

[Baptiste Daroussin]

On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 01:10:56PM +0400, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
> 
> On 29 сент. 2014 г., at 12:01, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:52:50AM +0400, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >> 
> >> I am using FreeBSD-10/stable and pkg-1.3.8.
> >> 
> >> Consider py-dateutil port, it depends on py-six.
> >> 
> >> First, I installed py33-dateutil (with py33-six), for python3.
> >> 
> >> Now I install py-dateutil for python2.  Upon installation, I get the following waring:
> >> ===>  Installing for py27-dateutil-2.2
> >> ===>   py27-dateutil-2.2 depends on package: py27-six>0 - found
> >> ===>   py27-dateutil-2.2 depends on package: py27-setuptools27>0 - found
> >> ===>   py27-dateutil-2.2 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.7 - found
> >> ===>  Checking if py27-dateutil already installed
> >> ===>   Registering installation for py27-dateutil-2.2
> >> pkg-static: py27-dateutil-2.2: duplicate dependency listing: py33-six-1.5.2, ignoring
> >> 
> >> When I try to deinstall py27-six, I get:
> >> 
> >> # pkg delete py27-six
> >> Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting)
> >> Deinstallation has been requested for the following 3 packages (of 0 packages in the universe):
> >> 
> >> Installed packages to be REMOVED:
> >>        py27-six-1.8.0
> >>        py33-dateutil-2.1_3 (depends on py27-six-1.8.0)
> >>        py27-dateutil-2.2 (depends on py27-six-1.8.0)
> >> 
> >> The operation will free 1 MB.
> >> 
> >> Proceed with deinstalling packages? [y/N]: 
> >> 
> >> (it wants to deinstall both versions of py-dateutil).
> >> 
> >> Something looks broken here.
> >> 
> >> Some time ago it did not let to install the same port for different python version, now it is possible but deps registration looks broken.
> > 
> > I do not have time for this right now, I'll see in a couple of days, but CCing
> > parties that should be interested :)
> > 
> 
> 
> Can you reproduce this or is this a problem on my side?

Bryan has fixed it iirc, this was a port bug.

regards,
Bapt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-python/attachments/20141007/820981f2/attachment.sig>