[Bug 193316] [NEW PORT]: www/py-djblets06: Legacy version of py-djblets

[bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193316

--- Comment #32 from Jingfeng Yan <yan_jingfeng at yahoo.com> ---
(In reply to John Marino from comment #31)
> (In reply to chris.dukes.aix from comment #29)
> > And to repeat my earlier statement.
> > You need Djblets.
> > You do not need Djblets packaged for FreeBSD.
> 
> If djblets-06 is needed for seahub in FreeBSD (which can't be committed
> until this is sorted) it has to be ports in FreeBSD.  The exception is if
> seahub adds djblets-06 as one if its distfiles and builds it in the workdir
> at the same time as seahub.  Maybe this is what you mean by "virtualenv",
> but this virtualenv has to work within ports without using the network
> during the build phase.
> 
> 
> > If not... your back to learning about packaging dependencies and best practices for an app framework... or hiring someone to do the work.
> 
> Not me.  I just commit ports to the tree when its ready.  I just wanted
> python@ to say the *legacy* port should or should not be in the tree.

Hehe, I know it is not "you" (Marino). Never take it personally.  Otherwise, I
will feel that I am the nut. :) 

  Some wording sounds not very friendly.  I have finished using other way to
install all the python dependencies. The virtualenv idea is right direction,
but it is heavy-weight, and seahub release directory layout could be change a
lot. So, I twist the seahub Makefile by borrowing the idea of virtualenv.   So,
we don't need this this port any more. I will try to close this issue.  If I
can not, could anyone help to close it.  Thanks to all the reviewers for your
efforts and suggestion.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.