[CFR] lang/python26 removal

[Ruslan Makhmatkhanov]

René Ladan wrote on 06.01.2014 16:00:
> 2014/1/6 Ruslan Makhmatkhanov <cvs-src at yandex.ru>:
>> René Ladan wrote on 06.01.2014 15:34:
>>
>>> 2014/1/6 Ruslan Makhmatkhanov <cvs-src at yandex.ru>:
>>>>
>>>> René Ladan wrote on 05.01.2014 15:57:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> lang/python26 expired a few days ago, so I patched Mk/bsd.pyton.mk to
>>>>> exclude lang/python26 and patched the USE_PYTHON* lines of all ports
>>>>> referring to Python < 2.7. You must remove lang/python26 manually to not
>>>>> break INDEX.
>>>>>
>>>>> The patch is available at
>>>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~rene/patches/python-to-27.diff
>>>>> The bsd.python.mk patch itself is also here:
>>>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~rene/patches/Mk__bsd.python.mk.diff
>>>>>
>>>>> mat@ already gave an "OK" for the USE_PYTHON* bumps.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does this patch and removing lang/python26 look OK to you?
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not on python@ , so please CC me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> René
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'd say please go on with that. But there is two things there, that would
>>>> be
>>>> great to be fixed before commiting:
>>>> - value of 2 need to be used instead of 2.7 in USE_PYTHON in your patch
>>>
>>> This is because I converted -2.7 to 2.7 etc.  Are you saying that all
>>> USE_PYTHON*=2.7 should be converted to USE_PYTHON*=2 and that
>>> other USE_PYTHON* values are OK ?
>>
>>
>> I just looked at it again:
>>
>> -2.7 and 2.7 should be converted to just `2'
>> 2.x+ should be converted to just `yes' to keep it's current meaning
>>
>> Will this `yes'-ports actually build with 3.x - that will be checked later
>> for all the tree. I have plans for this.
>>
> I'll redo the patch with the above two conversion rules and blame any
> breakage on you :-p
>
> Regards,
> René

Ok). But please send it here for review).

-- 
Regards,
Ruslan

T.O.S. Of Reality