ports/171645: [PATCH] devel/py-ice: Allow building using Clang, general overhaul

[Tony Maher]

The following reply was made to PR ports/171645; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Tony Maher <tonymaher at optusnet.com.au>
To: Michael Gmelin <freebsd at grem.de>
Cc: bug-followup at FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/171645: [PATCH] devel/py-ice: Allow building using Clang,
 general overhaul
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2012 17:06:11 +1000

 On 10/06/12 09:45, Michael Gmelin wrote:
 
 > Hi Tony,
 >
 > Thanks for you quick response. If you don't have the resources to
 > maintain the port right now and if you're ok with it I would like to
 > take over maintainership for the devl/py-ice port. It would make sense
 > since I'm also maintaining devel/ice and updates usually affect both
 > ports anyway. In that case it might make sense to close the current
 > ticket and I would submit a new one, which includes my email address as
 > the new maintainer (afaik this should work, if not, maybe it would be
 > better if you could submit it yourself - not entirely sure, since I
 > only did this once before).
 >
 > If you prefer to keep maintainership or if you want to push out that
 > update before initiating a takeover, I attached the patch again
 > in gzip format to this email once more (knowing that it will not show
 > up correctly in the PR system right now). I also double checked it
 > applies cleanly, this is the way I applied it to a freshly checked out
 > ports tree:
 >
 > cd /usr/ports/devel/py-ice
 > zcat /tmp/py27-Ice-3.4.2_3.patch.gz | patch -p0 -E
 > find . -name \*.orig -delete
 >
 > This results in:
 >
 > [root at bsd /usr/ports/devel/py-ice]# find .
 > .
 > ./distinfo
 > ./pkg-plist
 > ./Makefile
 > ./files
 > ./files/Make.rules.FreeBSD
 > ./files/patch-py-python-Makefile
 > ./files/patch-py-test-Ice-info-AllTests.py
 > ./files/patch-config-Make.common.rules
 > ./files/patch-py-test-Ice-properties-run.py
 > ./files/patch-py-config-Make.rules
 > ./pkg-descr
 >
 > Please double check if this worked ok, since the patch removed files.
 > If you had to manually move things into place, emptying/removing files
 > might also have failed (and manual intervention shouldn't be necessary
 > if applied using patch -p0 -E). I probably should have put that in the
 > original post, sorry.
 >
 > Cheers,
 > Michael
 >
 >
 
 Ok this all worked fine so can commit and make yourself maintainer.
 
 thanks!
 -- 
 Tony Maher                    email: tonymaher at optusnet.com.au