[RFC] lang/python30 (and lang/python*) fixes

[Li-Wen Hsu]

On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 22:57:14 +1000, Andrew MacIntyre wrote:
> Given the experimental nature of Python 3.0, and the fact that 3.1 is 
> out, it seems to me that Python 3.0's time in the ports collection
> should not be extended.

Yes.  But as long as we do not set Python 3.0 as the default Python
version, I thought there is no harm keeping 3.0 in the ports tree.

However, is there any need for keeping python 2.3, or even 2.4 in the
ports tree?

-- 
Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu AT FreeBSD.org>
http://lwhsu.org