llvm FreeBSD powerpc ABI target bug fix: Re: [Bug 26519] Clang 4.0.0's "Target: powerpc-unknown-freebsd11.0" code generation is violating the SVR4 ABI (SEGV can result)

Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net
Sat May 6 09:59:43 UTC 2017


[I'm top posting a find of another stack
handling failure example from the updated
compiler for TARGET_ARCH=powerpc .]

Bad news: Another code generation error, this
time demonstrated in compiling part of perl5. . .
(I tried to build a port that indirectly
tried build perl5 but perl5's miniperl crashes.)

/usr/obj/portswork/usr/ports/lang/perl5.24/work/perl-5.24.1/numeric.c

has Perl_cast_iv(NV f) for which clang double stores
two different things to one address [24(r1)]. Below
the => lines are the double store, the second
destroying the r30 value that was saved in the first:

Dump of assembler code for function Perl_cast_iv:
   0x0196a114 <+0>:	mflr    r0
   0x0196a118 <+4>:	stw     r0,4(r1)
   0x0196a11c <+8>:	stwu    r1,-32(r1)
   0x0196a120 <+12>:	stw     r31,28(r1)
=>   0x0196a124 <+16>:	stw     r30,24(r1)
   0x0196a128 <+20>:	mr      r31,r1
   0x0196a12c <+24>:	mfcr    r12
=>   0x0196a130 <+28>:	stw     r12,24(r31)

Note: r31 == r1 for that second "=>" line.

The return code sequence has a similar
problem: two loads from the same address
for what should be distinct values.

Note: r31 == r1 here too.

=>   0x0196a1bc <+168>:	lwz     r12,24(r31)
   0x0196a1c0 <+172>:	lwz     r0,36(r1)
   0x0196a1c4 <+176>:	lwz     r31,28(r1)
=>   0x0196a1c8 <+180>:	lwz     r30,24(r1)
   0x0196a1cc <+184>:	mtcrf   32,r12
   0x0196a1d0 <+188>:	addi    r1,r1,32
   0x0196a1d4 <+192>:	mtlr    r0
   0x0196a1d8 <+196>:	blr

The Perl_cast_iv source code looks like:

IV
Perl_cast_iv(NV f)
{
  if (f < IV_MAX_P1)
    return f < IV_MIN ? IV_MIN : (IV) f;
  if (f < UV_MAX_P1) {
#if CASTFLAGS & 2
    /* For future flexibility allowing for sizeof(UV) >= sizeof(IV)  */
    if (f < UV_MAX_P1_HALF)
      return (IV)(UV) f;
    f -= UV_MAX_P1_HALF;
    return (IV)(((UV) f) | (1 + (UV_MAX >> 1)));
#else
    return (IV)(UV) f;
#endif
  }
  return f > 0 ? (IV)UV_MAX : 0 /* NaN */;
}


This sort of thing might explain the
occasional panic that names ffs_truncate
if there is some infrequently used
routine that messes up the stack.


On 2017-May-6, at 12:06 AM, Mark Millard <markmi at dsl-only.net> wrote:

> On 2017-May-5, at 10:13 PM, Mark Millard <markmi at dsl-only.net> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 2017-May-5, at 6:11 PM, Mark Millard <markmi at dsl-only.net> wrote:
>> 
>>>>> . . .
>>>>> 
>>>>> For the gcc 4.2.1 based kernel boot I have
>>>>> had  one odd fatal kernel trap (0x903a64a,
>>>>> "unknown") where the lr showed 0x907f . It
>>>>> reported being stopped at:
>>>>> 
>>>>> ffs_truncate+0x1080
>>>>> 
>>>>> It appears that "call doadump" worked but
>>>>> I've not looked at what was put in
>>>>> /var/crash/ .
>>>> 
>>>> If I leave the PowerMac idle running:
> 
> It also happens when busy.
> 
>>>> # uname -paKU
>>>> FreeBSD FBSDG4S 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT  r317820M  powerpc powerpc 1200030 1200030
>>>> 
>>>> it eventually gets the same ffs_truncate-tied fatal
>>>> kernel trap, with the same odd lr and the like.
>>>> 
>>>> So, while I cannot directly cause the problem
>>>> at a specific time, the problem is repeatable.
>>>> 
>>>> . . .
>>> 
>>> The ffs_truncate issue is odd:
>>> 
>>> A) It was gcc 4.2.1 based for both kernel and world.
>>> B) I built a gcc 4.2.1 based debug kernel and
>>> installed it but that does not get the problem.
>>> 
>>> I sam trying the gcc 4.2.1 debug kernel with the
>>> system clang 4 world now and will later switch
>>> to the gcc 4.2.1 non-debug kernel to see what
>>> happens.
>>> 
>>> But being a pure gcc 4.2.1 environment originally
>>> suggests that the ffs_truncate issue is not
>>> clang-toolchain related.
>> 
>> I found a bad (old) kernel module in /boot/kernel/
>> and eliminating it appears to have removed the
>> ffs_truncate problem.
>> 
>> . . .
> 
> For the ffs_truncate problem I spoke too
> soon: It happened again, this time while
> the old PowerMac was busy.
> 
> The detail numbers and such were again the
> same.


===
Mark Millard
markmi at dsl-only.net



More information about the freebsd-ppc mailing list