is bsd.database.mk out of sync with Uses/pgsql.mk?

[Baptiste Daroussin]

On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 08:45:51AM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
> 
> 
> On 28 September 2014 11:36:41 BST, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> >On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 03:52:56PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> >> Today I encountered these build messages with poudriere:
> >> 
> >> Invalid PGSQL default version 92; valid versions are 8.4 9.0 9.1 9.2
> >9.3 9.4
> >> 
> >> These messages originate in Mk/Uses/pgsql.mk
> >> 
> >> But Mk/bsd.database.mk claims a different format is correct:
> >> 
> >> # DEFAULT_PGSQL_VER
> >> #                       - PostgreSQL default version, currently 90.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Do you agree that the comments in Mk/bsd.database.mk need to updated?
> >
> >Everything should migrate to USES=pgsql and the code in bsd.database.mk
> >should
> >just die.
> >
> 
> I'm pretty sure I put developer warnings there too about this!
> 
> Chris
> 
Putting warning is ok but you should also driver the migration so far
I did most of the migrations.

Bapt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20141011/7d158c63/attachment.sig>