py-imaging vs. py-pillow
Marcus von Appen
mva at FreeBSD.org
Fri Oct 3 20:31:58 UTC 2014
On, Fri Oct 03, 2014, Stefan Ehmann wrote:
> According to freshports there are about 10 ports that depend on
> py-pilllow and 50 that depend on py-imaging.
>
> py-imaging conflicts with py-pilllow. E.g., calibre and xmbc cannot be
> installed at the same time.
>
>
> I noticed the problem because calibre switched to py-pilllow recently.
> There really should be a way that these packages can coexist.
>
> (py-imaging/py-pilllow maintainers CCed)
I just pushed a patch to
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193957, which updates
pillow, makes it available for different python versions at the same time and
addresses db@'s _imagingtk issue
(https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193958).
This should allow us to migrate the ports to pillow.
Cheers
Marcus
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20141003/5aa50927/attachment.sig>
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list