py-imaging vs. py-pillow

Stefan Ehmann shoesoft at gmx.net
Fri Oct 3 12:01:39 UTC 2014


On 03.10.2014 13:37, William Grzybowski wrote:
> Coexist how? They are essentially the same package. I don't see how
> thats possible.

I meant that you should be able to install ports that depend on 
py-imaging and ports that depend on py-imaging at the same time.

> py-imaging is deprecated, they should be switched to py-pillow and thats it.

If py-pillow is a compatible drop-in replacement of py-imaging then 
that's probably the best solution.


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list