py-imaging vs. py-pillow
Stefan Ehmann
shoesoft at gmx.net
Fri Oct 3 12:01:39 UTC 2014
On 03.10.2014 13:37, William Grzybowski wrote:
> Coexist how? They are essentially the same package. I don't see how
> thats possible.
I meant that you should be able to install ports that depend on
py-imaging and ports that depend on py-imaging at the same time.
> py-imaging is deprecated, they should be switched to py-pillow and thats it.
If py-pillow is a compatible drop-in replacement of py-imaging then
that's probably the best solution.
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list