ports/189880: port pgpool-II out of date.

[Matthew Seaman]

On 15/06/2014 22:49, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
> Personally I think:
> 
> databases/pgpool (3.1.x)
> databases/pgpool-devel (3.3.x)
>> > Given the lack of history in the ports, I'd say lets just skip
>> > pgpool-II-3.2
> Agreed. (effectively already done)

Except that pgpool-II-3.3.3 is a stable release version, and not what
would normally be considered a 'development' version.   In principle for
anyone wanting to install pgpool-II for the first time the choice should
be to use version 3.3.3.  I think there's a 3.4 branch that would
qualify for pgpool-II-devel if anyone wanted to write that port.  Also,
the established name does seem to be 'pgpool-II' despite the 'II' being
an ersatz version number.

However, this is orthogonal to getting 3.3.3 into the tree in the first
place.  Why don't we proceed with adding a databases/pgpool-II-33 port
now, and deal with indicating which one is the default and whether some
of the older versions should be removed as a separate item later?

	Cheers,

	Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1036 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20140616/99837821/attachment.sig>