FreeBSD Port: strongswan-5.1.1_1

[Clemens Schrimpe]

On 18.02.2014, at 16:12, Francois ten Krooden <ftk at Nanoteq.com> wrote:

> I will have a look on my test setup with FreeBSD to see if I can get the same error.

Thank you. Watch for messages re: PF_ROUTE failed, like these:

21[KNL] adding PF_ROUTE route failed: Invalid argument
21[KNL] installing route failed: 192.68.1.1/32 via (null) src %any dev vtnet1


> As far as I know there wasn’t any changes that would cause this issue.

My suspicion is, that the PF_ROUTE interfaces vary between Linux, OpenBSD and FreeBSD - and nobody really "ported" the code. Again: This is just a rough suspicion - I need to familiarize myself with the respective interfaces within Linux / OpenBSD.


>  Just a question, did you recompile the standard FreeBSD kernel to include the support for IPsec, since the default kernel does not include the IPsec support.

Of course. And Raccoon works fine - it just sucks in so many other ways, that I'd rather use Strongswan :-)

Thanks -

	Clemens

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3736 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20140218/5e38d861/attachment.bin>