HEADS UP: Berkeley DB 4...4.7 port removals/upgrades may require manual preparation

[Dennis Glatting]

On Sun, 2014-08-24 at 15:08 +0200, olli hauer wrote:
> On 2014-08-24 14:37, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 14:30:06 +0200
> > Kurt Jaeger <lists at opsec.eu> wrote:
> > 
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >>>> Hm, using USE_BDB=$numble looks wrong to me in devel/ice.
> >>>>
> >>>> Can you test the following patch.
> >>>>
> >>>> Index: Makefile
> >>>> ===================================================================
> >>>> --- devel/ice/Makefile    (revision 365910)
> >>>> +++ devel/ice/Makefile    (working copy)
> >>>> @@ -27,7 +27,8 @@
> >>>>  .endif
> >>>>
> >>>>  USES=                  iconv gmake
> >>>> -USE_BDB=               5
> >>>> +USE_BDB=               yes
> >>>> +WANT_BDB_VER=          5
> >>>>  INVALID_BDB_VER=       40 41 42 43 44 46 47 48 6
> >>>>  USE_LDCONFIG=          yes
> >>>>  BUILD_WRKSRC?=         ${WRKSRC}/cpp
> >>
> >>> @Kurt: Could you test and confirm? If this works, I'll commit the
> >>> patch.
> >>
> >> Yes, it builds.
> >>
> > 
> > I created a commit request
> > 
> > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D679
> > 
> 
> Kurt, or you can commit this even w.o. PR.
> The patch does not break anything but allows the port to build as required.
> I assume there are even more easter eggs in the tree, specially for USE_BDB.
> 

Yep:

root at Junker# more databases/evolution-data-server/Makefile 

...

USE_BDB=        41+