10.0-hosted tinderbox: 8.4 builds broken?
Alexey Dokuchaev
danfe at nsu.ru
Sun Oct 20 14:51:27 UTC 2013
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 01:36:45PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
> It appears that really weird SRCBASE assumptions are made throughout the
> code. I'll have to put a temporary hack in to just make SRCBASE appear
> inside the chroot whatever it's set to. Setting and unsetting SRCBASE
> just breaks different things in weird ways, and this is the only reliable
> fix I've found.
I've just setup another tinderbox here on 11-CURRENT and did a fresh
checkout from CVS; I confirm that I can build packages for both 9.2 and
10.0-BETA just fine now, thanks!
However I've noticed another regression: doing chmod g+w /usr/ports/distfiles
in the middle of the tinder run totally confuses it: all build attempts
after chmod fail with identical tiny log files:
building lcms2-2.5 in directory /usr/home/danfe/tb/9.2-wip
make: cannot open /a/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk.
cd: /usr/ports/graphics/lcms2: No such file or directory
The reason for a chmod: I normally build ports from a user, and to allow
it to fetch distfiles, give write permissions to wheel group. I also do
./tc configDistfile -c /usr/ports/distfiles, and it always changed perms
back. It's annoying, but I can live with it: just chmod the damn directory
again.
chmod'ing in the middle of tinder run is because I often do the runs while
installing something from ports manually at the same time.
Previously tinderbox simply complained like this in the end of the build
log:
================================================================
Fatal error: filesystem was touched prior to 'make install' phase
distcache changed
permissions expected 0755 found 0775
================================================================
But this (and subsequent) packages were still built successfully.
Now chmod'ing totally screws up the whole (remaining) build.
BTW, would it be possible to prevent forcing 0755 perms? I don't really
see any point for doing this in the first place...
./danfe
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list