The vim port needs a refresh
John Marino
freebsdml at marino.st
Tue May 28 06:04:04 UTC 2013
On 5/28/2013 02:44, Martin Wilke wrote:
>
> On the first note, complain about the patches to the upstream, not to us. This patches problem has been around since forever and so long the upstream
> is not changing anything about it, nor do we.
Hi Martin,
This statement is hand-waives the entire discussion, which took as a
*given* that upstream is the problem who crazy policies will not change.
I already said that "95%" of the blame (probably more) should get
allocated there.
The whole discussion started because upstream will clearly not change.
About rolling your own distfile, I completely disagree because we do not
know what the maintaner has changed,
> and seeing it from the security view, I prefer to get all my patches from the original mirrors.
1. Yes, some amount of trust is necessary but hopefully we don't have
maintainers that aren't trusted.
2. A trivial script can verify the roll-up contains only official
patches, which could be executed by the committer prior to committing
changes to distfile. That's a pretty easy "security" issue to address.
I get your point but that issue could be solved.
John
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list