[HEADSUP] New mailing pkg-fallout

[olli hauer]

On 2013-07-18 21:09, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 09:04:09PM +0200, olli hauer wrote:
>> On 2013-07-17 18:57, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>> Hi all, 
>>>
>>> If you are a committer or if you are maintainer it is highly recommanded for
>>> you to subscribe to the pkg-fallout mailing list.
>>>
>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pkg-fallout
>>>
>>> This list receive all the failures mails from the package building cluster.
>>> Please keep in eye on this list and make sure none of your ports or the ports
>>> you care about are failing.
>>>
>>> Right now the mailing list receive the failures from the experimental package
>>> building for pkgng packages.
>>>
>>> Soon we will add a continuous building server which will have stricter QA rules.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> Bapt
>>>
>>
>> Hm, I just picked the bugzilla44 port and struggle over the logs.
>>
>>> ===>  de-bugzilla-4.4 conflicts with installed package(s): 
>>>       bugzilla-4.2.6
>>>
>>>       They install files into the same place.
>>>       Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1).
>>> *** Error code 1
>>
>> But I found no hint in the log that bugzilla-4.2.6 was installed before. [1]
>>
>> The same issue for was raised for the de-bugzilla port, I suspect (ru|ja)-bugzilla44 and (de|ru|ja)-bugzilla will fail with the same issue.
>>
>> Is it possible that the new builds do not start with a clean build environment?
>>
>> [1]
>> http://beefy1.isc.freebsd.org/bulk/83i386-default/2013-07-17_14h38m27s/logs/de-bugzilla-4.4.log
>> http://beefy2.isc.freebsd.org/bulk/83amd64-default/2013-07-17_14h39m18s/logs/de-bugzilla-4.4.log
>>
>>
>> Maybe someone can enlighten my
>>
>> --
>> olli
> 
> No it always starts from a clean room, 100% sure of it.
> 
> I still have lot of work on the cluster right now, next week I'll probably have
> more time to help
> 

OK, maybe you see why the issue was raised.
I really have no idea since I haven't seen this on my tinderbox builds.

--
Regards,
olli