p5-ack renamed ack, no entry in UPDATING

[Chris Rees]

On 14 January 2013 19:27, Eitan Adler <lists at eitanadler.com> wrote:
> On 14 January 2013 14:04, Vick Khera <vivek at khera.org> wrote:
>> My apologies. I use portmaster. I don't know why I typed portupgrade in that
>> original message. Looking at the history file from my shell I see
>> "portmaster -o textproc/ack p5-ack-1.96_1" was used to correct the fact that
>> p5-ack was leftover after a "portmaster -a" run.
>>
>> I agree duplicating the info in UPDATING would be unnecessary. I did not
>> have it in my procedures to look into MOVING. I will do that from now on.
>
> This should not be required. MOVING is designed for machines to read,
> not humans.  IMHO portmaster should remove the old version (at least
> if given an appropriate flag).

I'm certain it does... Vick, if you can reproduce this error, please
file a PR against portmaster; this is a bug!

Chris