about the Berkeley DB 4 "cleanup"
Randy Pratt
bsd-unix at embarqmail.com
Mon Dec 16 14:37:23 UTC 2013
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 07:51:54 -0500
Robert Huff <roberthuff at rcn.com> wrote:
>
> [Ref: ports/UPDATING 20131214]
>
> I am an indirect user of BDB (currently ver 4.3); "pkg version
> -r" reports
>
> redland-1.0.16
> ruby19-bdb43-0.6.6_1
> webalizer-geoip-2.23.8
> php5-5.4.21
> xmms-1.2.11_20
> libreoffice-4.0.6_1
> gramps-3.3.0_2
> docproj-2.0_1
> librcc-0.2.12
> apr-1.4.8.1.5.3
> apache24-2.4.6_1
> subversion-1.8.5
> py27-bsddb-2.7.6_3
> portupgrade-2.4.11.3,2
>
>
> as being dependant, and I suspect the list will be longer with
> each passing day.
> While I appreciate the work done to move the universe along,
> the upgrade instructions included (by reference) are partially past
> my understanding and _way_ beyond my comfort zone. (And I suspect
> I'm not alone.)
> So: what explodes if I simply set "WITH_BDB_VER=5", shutdown my
> services, and rebuild?
> Alternately: does someone whose comfort zone this is well
> within) have a script that will take care of things?
I've got a similar list of dependencies but only subversion and
apr actually use BDB. The rest seem to be dependencies on apr.
I went a step further and set "WITH_BDB_VER=5" in /etc/make.conf and
proceeded to update. At the end, I still had db42-4.2.52_5. I
suspect it was because that neither apr or subversion needed updated.
I'm not sure if I should switch the origin of BDB for involved ports,
do forced rebuild of a few ports or if doing a recursive update is
needed. Some additional direction would be much appreciated.
My eyes glazed over trying to read the Wiki link to updating since
I don't know database vocabulary so you're not alone ;-)
Randy
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list