MAINTAINER lines and Real Names

[Olli Hauer]

On 2012-09-12 00:50, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> Like with Apache, x 11, or perl?
> Trying to get something there committed it's like pulling tiger teeth with
> a pair of pliers. return I agree multiple maintainers is a bad idea.
> If someone is technical enough to want to maintain that, they can always
> use an alias it goes to a group.
> Oh, were talking to Apache  x 11 or Perl again
> 


I see no reason for having multiple MAINTAINERS.
Commit with implicit and if you like give a statement
http://wiki.freebsd.org/MaintainerNotes about co-maintaining.

I already wiped my eyes on this commit
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=304107

Or as Alberto already explained the reasons for a team form one.

@Michael
Trolling or experience?

$> query-pr -c ports -r apache -y scheidel -q
 query-pr: no PRs matched

$> query-pr -c ports -r perl -y scheidel -q
 oh, found two PR's for 4.11 and 5.5

$> query-pr -c ports -r x11 -y scheidel -q
 query-pr: no PRs matched


--
Regards,
olli