[HEADSUP] New framework options aka optionng

[Baptiste Daroussin]

On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 08:34:37AM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote:
> Erwin Lansing ha scritto:
> > portmgr has been working for long on a new option framework for the ports to improve some of the deficiencies in the current framework.
> 
> Great work! Looking quickly at the documentation I have a doubt: while I 
> think most ports handle NOPORTDOCS, I think WITHOUT_NLS is handled only 
> by a small percentage, so, if I have understood correctly, many ports 
> should include OPTIONS_EXCLUDE=NLS. Is it correct?

You are right the documentation is not clear concerning that point.

In this implementation option is enforced at all, only default value are set by
the bsd.options.mk which are DOCS and NLS.

crees can you fix that part of the doc? the infomation I sent to you first
weren't clear about it, sorry.

So currently DOCS and NLS are set on if they are defined by the
maintainer and only if they are defined by the maintainer.

So no change expected at all from the current defaults.

Bapt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20120512/9247d123/attachment.pgp