Fix nvidia-like ports, help needed

[Doug Barton]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 02/28/2012 14:36, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 01:19:44PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 2/28/2012 1:15 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>> Here is a patch to add support for includedir keyword to
>>> libmap.conf so that we
>> 
>> I think this is overly complicated, and not generally useful. It
>> also delays the utility of the solution until this gets into the
>> base.
>> 
>> What I would do instead is to incorporate an nvidia option into
>> the xorg meta-port, and separate the GL libs into a separate
>> port. If the nvidia option is checked the GL libs come from an
>> nvidia slave port. If not, they come from an xorg-server slave
>> port.
>> 
>> Or, we just keep doing what we're doing now, since it works. I'm
>> still not sure what problem we're trying to solve. :)
>> 
>> 
>> Doug
> 
> the problem we are trying to solve is to avoid having the nvidia
> drivers overwritting libGL.so.1 which break the package database
> consistency.

In that case the solution I outlined above would work, and it's hard
for me to see why it wouldn't be the best solution.


Doug

- -- 

    This .signature sanitized for your protection
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJPUJQUAAoJEFzGhvEaGryEoIYIANJ0DHtcxIRCCY85rKB/2ENQ
p8iSPhkuA99eGsbBukzhBpyivNskm10/W5XnhLy+VzuyX6UmxRfa1w+hxp7tej75
zZHrSnByb3j3iYG9MgiE/Doeo1Iwg8qknhr+W6JhVVTZQH0jM4Y3uPd4xxlLc8lT
GDhtbPWPeQMggzJdjiajQSUJBLZMMoFzXGiaetr0yyz4HwEv8IjcUSTdkZ/ixHB5
5GoVODLr5RuGCErYWLTzR2DytZ9MroJwH+iRcWNuY5w7aAG6SF5Wqytsq3RgYqga
bWUBVCtozaAah+clGR8dkyL0IC+RZxSRdoR3JqlXtfAbhZBnHuo9VYOlhLtPMIA=
=+RmT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----