optionsng and tinderbox?

[Matthew Seaman]

On 21/06/2012 10:26, Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote:
>> > However on inspection, openldap24-server and openldap24-client take
>> > different sets of options: -server takes a super-set of -client.  So
>> > having a shared OPTIONSFILE doesn't make sense to me [...]

> You're right ! This is now fixed in the current ports tree, but your
> patch reversed that change :p Could you remove the OPTIONS_DIR patch for
> net/openldap24-server ?

Fixed in the latest iteration of the patches on Freefall.  While I was
there, I made the equivalent change with respect to openldap23-server
(ie. not using OPTIONS_DIR at all) although that makes little difference
as openldap23-client doesn't use any options at all.

	Cheers,

	Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 267 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20120621/61d3059a/signature.pgp