Ruby 1.9 as default

[Steve Wills]

On Jun 7, 2012, at 2:58 PM, Mel Flynn <rflynn at acsalaska.net> wrote:

> On 2-6-2012 3:32, Steve Wills wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> I think we should try to make Ruby 1.9 the default Ruby again and would
>> like to see it done before 9.1 is released. I've submitted a patch which
>> does this and requested and exp-run from portmgr.
> 
> This may become obsolete soon, since graphics/gdal is going to be
> updated, but with my current (slightly outdated) ports tree it fails
> with not being able to find:
> a) the ruby binary since there is no /usr/local/bin/ruby

This is expected. Try setting RUBY_DEFAULT_VER instead.

> b) as a side-effect ruby.h, but also because swig is using a deprecated
> Config interface that apparently is unable to set the include path
> correctly.
> 

Sounds like it just needs a s/Config/RbConfig/ which is a standard Ruby 1.9 comparability fix. 

Steve

> swig-1.3.40
> RUBY_VER=1.9 in /etc/make.conf
> RUBY config option set in graphics/gdal
> 
> Given issues described with swig 1.x earlier on this list, you may want
> to investigate if swig 1.x should be removed/patched/whatever before
> this sweep.
> -- 
> Mel
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"