Question about new options framework (regression?)

[Eitan Adler]

On 25 July 2012 15:57, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt at freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:24:27PM +0200, Olli Hauer wrote:
>> On 2012-07-25 20:18, Scot Hetzel wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Oliver Fromme <olli at lurza.secnetix.de> wrote:
>>
>> The following diff will restore the old behavior so make.conf and command params have priority.
>> (Place the make.conf part after the OPTIONS_FILE_SET part)
>>
>> Until now I cannot see why the OPTIONS file should always win.
>>
>
> because the priority goes to global to specific and the most specific is the
> options file.
>
> if most people want the options file to not have the final priority, why not,
> can others spread their opinion here?

An option specified on the command line is more specific and should
have priority over saved values or configuration files.

-- 
Eitan Adler