proper use of bsd.port.options.mk

[Doug Barton]

On 05/16/2011 13:17, Chris Rees wrote:
> You can't define USE_JAVA_after_  bsd.port.pre.mk and expect JAVA_PORT
> to be defined...

What I'm looking for is an actual example of something that doesn't work 
for the common case. Where "actual" includes a path to a port that I can 
test.

And I'm not trying to be a pita here, I have two goals; one is to update 
my ports to use bsd.port.options.mk, and the other is to get the 
documentation updated. I don't want to do either until we are all sure 
that we know the facts accurately.


Doug

-- 

	Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
			-- OK Go

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/