Compiling ports in a post-9.0-RELEASE world

[Konstantin Tokarev]

17.03.2011, 20:33, "Matthias Andree" <matthias.andree at gmx.de>:
> Not necessarily.  If it's a documented extension that you'd allowed (and
> even by sticking to the implicit gnu89 language default of GCC) then
> you'll hardly hear back anything else than "invalid, works as documented".

Note that Clang supports c89 and gnu89 modes[1]

[1] http://clang.llvm.org/docs/UsersManual.html#c_modes

-- 
Regards,
Konstantin