[RFC] New category proposal, i18n

[Doug Barton]

Thomas Abthorpe wrote:
> To have localization, you need internationalization, so from this, I stand by 
> my original proposal of i18n.

I have no objection to your reasoning, but continue to object to the
specific string. If you're going to go down this road then
"internationalization" would be the better choice.

Doug

-- 

    This .signature sanitized for your protection