Gnome reference framework bsd.gnome-reference.mk VS [NO]PORTDOCS
Jeremy Messenger
mezz7 at cox.net
Wed May 21 20:00:50 UTC 2008
On Wed, 21 May 2008 11:56:59 -0500, Alexey Shuvaev
<shuvaev at physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> wrote:
> Hello list!
>
> I am working on update to x11-toolkits/gtkdatabox2 and it has recently
> got
> an html reference (built using gtk-doc). The gtkdatabox2 is a rather
> rarely used port and its reference consists of app. 25 files (for now).
> What is better,
> - to create separate gtkdatabox-reference port, or
> - to intstall documentation from the existing port, under the
> control of NOPORTDOCS variable?
It's up to you. If it was my port, I would have chosen #2 option since
it's very small and I dislike reference framework. If it's big then I
possible would choice #1.
> The second question is about bsd.gnome-reference.mk framework discussed
> recently[1]. Althoug gtkdatabox is not an official part of gnome,
> it uses the same structure and therefore could be handled in the same way
> as other "official" gnome components. Are there any reasons to use one
> of:
> - devel/glib20-reference/bsd.gnome-reference.mk framework
> - handling docs on one's own?
It doesn't has to be only for GNOME. We have glib*-reference,
cairo-reference and others that aren't part of GNOME.
Cheers,
Mezz
> Thanks,
> Alexey.
>
> 1. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2008-May/048645.html
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2008-May/048647.html
--
mezz7 at cox.net - mezz at FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome at FreeBSD.org
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list