ports with bad plist when NO{DOCS,EXAMPLES,PORTDATA} defined

[Ion-Mihai Tetcu]

On Mon, 19 May 2008 16:45:32 -0500
"Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7 at cox.net> wrote:

> > BTW, what's GNOME Team's infrastructure now?  
> 
> If tarball has reference[1] then we sometime use reference framework  
> (USE_GNOME=referencehack in master port and include  
> devel/glib20-reference/bsd.gnome-reference.mk in slave port). I don't  
> really like current reference framework because it's complicate than what  
> it is supposed to be and portlint doesn't work with it. Also, the  
> *-reference ports shouldn't have NOPORTDOCS option. Other than reference,  
> we use normal like other ports.

And how are updates tested - except when you hijack pointyhat :) ?

-- 
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"
FreeBSD committer -> itetcu at FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20080519/4922773e/signature.pgp