FreeBSD Port: clamav-0.93.1_2

[Adrian Thearle]

There is current a PR out for this issue

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=124643

Basicly the rc script tries to chmod it before it exists, the patch waits until the file exists (or a timeout) before chmoding it. Depending on your setup it might not actually be a problem for you.

I also posted a potential fix for this, if you like you can apply the patch and see if works for you too.

Let us know how you go, 

Adrian

freebsd-ports-request at freebsd.org wrote:
> Send freebsd-ports mailing list submissions to
> 	freebsd-ports at freebsd.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	freebsd-ports-request at freebsd.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	freebsd-ports-owner at freebsd.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of freebsd-ports digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: cfengine port update? (Jo Rhett)
>    2. Re: cfengine port update? (Jo Rhett)
>    3. FreeBSD Port: automake-1.9.6_2 (email)
>    4. Re: [Dovecot] v1.1.1 released (Geoffroy Desvernay)
>    5. FreeBSD Port: clamav-0.93.1_2 (???????? ??????)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:02:14 -0700
> From: Jo Rhett <jrhett at netconsonance.com>
> Subject: Re: cfengine port update?
> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam at ipt.ru>
> Cc: ports at FreeBSD.org
> Message-ID: <16B8C91A-13DF-4BFE-B85A-AE193EF12713 at netconsonance.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
>
> Sorry, I didn't see this until now.
>
> On May 9, 2008, at 12:19 AM, Boris Samorodov wrote:
>   
>>> If there's something wrong
>>> with them, someone needs to specify what is wrong.
>>>       
>> Seems that you shouldn't delete man pages from the Makefile.
>>     
>
> They were removed from the distribution, therefore they weren't  
> available to install.
>
>   
>>> FYI: none of the files you are mentioning are installed by 2.2.5 or
>>> 2.2.6.  That's residue from 2.2.3 packages.
>>>       
>> Did you mean that manfiles did exist at the distribution but not
>> got installed?
>>     
>
> No, I mean that between 2.2.3 and 2.2.5 those manpages stopped being  
> in the distribution.  They were apparently restored later as you  
> noted.  My patches were against 2.2.5 originally and I didn't look to  
> see if the manpages were restored for 2.2.6 :-(  This problem was  
> pretty much entirely because we had no updates for so long that I was  
> trying to track patches against patches against patches ...
>
> ANYWAY, irrelevant now.   See
> 	http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=124993
>
>