Idea about the ports tree included in the release

[Dmitry Marakasov]

* Alex Dupre (ale at FreeBSD.org) wrote:
> > In thinking about the guy who posted to -stable about using the tar'ed
> > up version of the ports tree, I had an idea that would make that more
> > useful. How hard would it be to include the c[v]sup checkouts file
> > with the tarball, and install it into some standard location?
> And why not the portsnap database instead? It seems the
> default/recommended method today.
I would think of both. I personally prefer c[v]sup because it doesn't
delete custom patches, which I have a dozen.

-- 
Dmitry A. Marakasov    | jabber: amdmi3 at jabber.ru
amdmi3 at amdmi3.ru       | http://www.amdmi3.ru