portmaster deletes failed ports

[Hans Lambermont]

Doug Barton wrote:

> Craig Boston wrote:
...
>> Though I still think "leaf ports" and "root ports" should be listed
>> together.
> 
> I have gone back and forth on that a few times myself. Does anyone
> else have an opinion?

I like the difference. Maybe because I also like 'pkg_tree -v' and
'pkg_tree -t -q' and the dependency graph tool from Garrett Wollman (at
http://people.freebsd.org/~wollman/portdeps.pl) together with graphviz.
It generates output like http://lambermont.dyndns.org/freebsd/ports.png
(my setup) where the root ports are the upper-left boxes and the leaf
ports are the right-side boxes. Ports that are depended on are ellipses.

groetjes,
   Hans Lambermont