Do we need a few more ports reviewers/committers?

Boris Samorodov bsam at ipt.ru
Fri May 12 11:05:13 UTC 2006


On Fri, 12 May 2006 12:53:50 +0200 Frank Steinborn wrote:
> Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > > But you wrong here. maintainer-update means "Update from Maintainer" but
> > > you're not yet. So the right class would be change-request.
> > 
> > Are you sure? Porters handbook Chapter 10 Upgrading:
> > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/port-upgrading.html
> > -----
> > The best way to send us the diff is by including it via send-pr(1)
> > (category ports). If you are volunteering to maintain the port, be
> > sure to put [maintainer update] at the beginning of your synopsis line
> > and set the ``Class'' of your PR to maintainer-update. Otherwise, the
> > ``Class'' of your PR should be change-request.
> > -----
> > 
> > Did I misunderstood something?

> If you *are* the maintainer of the port use [maintainer update],
> otherwise you should consider sending your patch to the maintainer
> directly or use at least [change-request].

The phrase "If you are volunteering to maintain the port, be sure to
put [maintainer update] at the beginning of your synopsis line and set
the ``Class'' of your PR to maintainer-update." seems to tell quite
the opposite.


WBR
-- 
Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer
InPharmTech Co,     http://www.ipt.ru
Telephone & Internet Service Provider


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list