[BOO!] Ruby 1.8.4 testers wanted
Jeremy Messenger
mezz7 at cox.net
Thu Jan 12 13:34:05 PST 2006
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:48:22 -0600, Pav Lucistnik <pav at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> Hi people,
>
> Alexander Wittig provided us with patches to upgrade our Ruby to 1.8.4.
>
> Because previous attempt to upgrade to 1.8.3 ended in flames, I want
> you, people who run ruby apps, to test the patches before I commit them.
> Find the patches at
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~pav/ruby/
Wish, you could have put all patches into a patch by together for one of
us can patch in /usr/ports quickly. ;-) Anyway....
> Please test them as much as possible.
I am installing those ruby stuff right now to test on ruby-gnome2-all
> If I don't hear any screaming, they'll hit the tree during weekend.
>
> In 1.8.4, there is a different behaviour of site-install target from
> mkmf generated Makefiles. Most obvious change is that .h files are no
> longer installed in modules. I hacked mkmf.rb to include install; target
> in site-install: target as it was in 1.8.2. Any Ruby wizard to tell me
> how to fix this properly?
Uh-oh, I don't really know but hopeful it won't break on any of
ruby-gnome2-all build. If it does, then I will trying to work on fix the
build.
> I'm interested in which ports broke with 1.8.3 back last fall, so I
> could check them out before committing? Anyone still remember? Kris?
I think it was ruby, oniguruma, FXRuby apps and rubygem-rails. The 1.8.3
made some changes that many apps don't like, so it's supposed to be fixed
in 1.8.4.
http://www.rubyonrails.org/down
===================================
We recommend Ruby 1.8.4 for use with Rails. Ruby 1.8.2 is fine too, but
version 1.8.3 is not.
===================================
> Once this is done, I'd like to start phasing out ruby16. Anyone
> disagree?
Agree, kill it.
Cheers,
Mezz
--
mezz7 at cox.net - mezz at FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome at FreeBSD.org
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list