Files removed from port update

[Erwin Lansing]

On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 11:32:39AM -0700, Zach Thompson wrote:
> Hi everyone,

Hi,
> 
> Should files removed from a port in an update be listed in the diff or
> only noted in the PR?
> 
My personal preference is both. This will also give 0 sized files in the
port which make them easy to spot and, in case the committer forgets to
cvs remove them, doesn't break the port. 

Cheers,
-erwin

-- 
Erwin Lansing                                     http://droso.org
Security is like an onion.          (o_ _o)
It's made up of several layers   \\\_\   /_///    erwin at FreeBSD.org
And it makes you cry.            <____) (____>    erwin at aauug.dk
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20060102/97f3f203/attachment.bin