Submitting a new port with dependancies not in the ports tree

[Erwin Lansing]

On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 10:53:03AM -0600, Josh Paetzel wrote:
> I'm in the process of writing a port and it has a dependancy that's 
> not in the ports tree, so I'm porting that as well.  My question is 
> what's the procedure in such a case?  Should I submit them both as 
> part of the same pr?  Obviously the one can't be committed without 
> the other.
> 
The easiest way is to submit the dependency first, then wait for the
mail from GNATS and submit the second with a clear notice that the other
PR (#10xxx) needs to be committed first.

Cheers,
-erwin

-- 
Erwin Lansing                                     http://droso.org
Security is like an onion.          (o_ _o)
It's made up of several layers   \\\_\   /_///    erwin at FreeBSD.org
And it makes you cry.            <____) (____>    erwin at aauug.dk
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20061224/f3b75f4c/attachment.pgp