Something is really not right with azureus 2.5 / diablo-jdk 1.5

[Marc G. Fournier]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


I had this too ... add:

[/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/]
libpthread.so                   libc_r.so
libpthread.so.2                 libc_r.so.6

to /etc/libmap.conf and it should clear it up ... at least it did for me ...

- --On Thursday, November 30, 2006 22:26:56 +0200 Kostik Belousov 
<kostikbel at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 11:36:10AM -0800, Tim Clewlow wrote:
>>
>> --- Robert Noland <rnoland at 2hip.net> wrote:
>>
>> > From: Robert Noland <rnoland at 2hip.net>
>> > To: freebsd-ports at freebsd.org
>> > Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:06:40 -0500
>> > Subject: Something is really not right with azureus 2.5 / diablo-jdk 1.5
>> >
>> >
>> > > Hello,
>> > >
>> > > I have azureus-2.5.0.0 which requires diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01_1 to build
>> > (among
>> > > other things). It builds and runs fine, however, azureus limps along for
>> > about
>> > > 10 minutes with very low download and upload speeds, then it seems to
>> > > grind
>> > to
>> > > a halt, the d/l and u/l basically stop. There are no errors to report
>> > because
>> > > the application keeps going, but the problem is it stops actually d/l or
>> > u/l
>> > > anything (sometimes you might get short bursts of extremely slow speeds,
>> > but it
>> > > is mostly 0 B/s).
>> > >
>> > > I suspect that diablo-jdk that is at fault, but in truth this is just a
>> > hunch.
>> >
>> > This is a problem with azureus, not the jdk.  The same issue exists with
>> > sun jdk15.  I am attempting to look at the code, but someone with more
>> > java foo than I would probably be much more productive.  It appears to
>> > be an issue with socket handling...
>> >
>> > robert.
>> >
>>
>> FYI - I discovered the internet connection was constantly at 100% u/l due to
>> a number of people on the LAN doing p2p, so I shaped the external link to
>> only allow 80% of the real uplink capacity (which creates a 20% buffer to
>> attempt to mininize collisions on the uplink) and azureus suddenly came back
>> to life. Note that azureus on the windows box was happy before I shaped the
>> link, but the BSD version was not. This makes me think the BSD version of
>> azureus gets into trouble when outgoing packets get lost due to packet
>> collision.
>>
>> Tim.
>
> Does this thing use nio ?



- ----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy at hub.org                              MSN . scrappy at hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy               Skype: hub.org        ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFFcpc34QvfyHIvDvMRArwHAJ4swp8JKUS7zmgyW4TLEo+INXDw3gCgoXUp
vINVlM3IA3F/eEMfdY/e5DU=
=f83e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----