devel/fam missing boot (rc.d/fam.sh)?

[Pav Lucistnik]

Clint Olsen píše v út 20. 09. 2005 v 14:05 -0700:

> Thanks for the hint.  However, since this was installed as a 
> prerequisite for the GNOME operating system (via portinstall), are we 
> supposed to examine every dependent package's pkg-message to find out 
> what we missed?
> 
> It would seem like you would want it to install it in one form or 
> another and allow the user to change it if that's not the preferred 
> method.  At least in that case you get a working daemon out of the box. 
>   It seems to jive with spirit of the more automated portinstall method.

When gnome2 port is finished installing, it prints a short message
containing http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/ link. If you go there and click
FAQ, one of the entry deals with FAM and points to that pkg-message.

Yes it's a bit cumbersome.

We (FreeBSE GNOME Team) is hoping to move soon to gamin, an alternative
fam implementation, which works out of the box.

-- 
Pav Lucistnik <pav at oook.cz>
              <pav at FreeBSD.org>

And now something completely different.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20050920/fd7b1dfc/attachment.bin