CONFLICTS for build, not for install ?

[Michael Nottebrock]

On Thursday, 10. March 2005 16:50, Marco Molteni wrote:

> Suggestions? I'd like to avoid rewriting all the #include, although
> it might be automated with some sed scripting.

You really *should* make a patch to fix the #include statements - for the port 
and for submission to the developers of enblend, so that upcoming versions of 
enblend won't have this problem. FWIW, if the resulting enblend port installs 
the vigraimpex shared library, you'll still need CONFLICTS as well.

-- 
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi at freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20050311/8fc0652e/attachment.bin