windowmaker 0.92 fails on amd64
Dejan Lesjak
dejan.lesjak at ijs.si
Sat Aug 6 00:23:23 GMT 2005
On Saturday 06 of August 2005 02:05, Doug Barton wrote:
> Dejan Lesjak wrote:
> > I can test as well.
> > I tried earlier with this patch to Makefile:
> >
> > --- Makefile.orig Sat Aug 6 01:40:59 2005
> > +++ Makefile Sat Aug 6 01:41:04 2005
> > @@ -49,6 +49,10 @@
> >
> > .include <bsd.port.pre.mk>
> >
> > +.if ${ARCH} == amd64
> > +CONFIGURE_ENV+= ac_cv_c_inline_asm=no
> > +.endif
> > +
> > .if defined(WITH_XINERAMA) || defined(PACKAGE_BUILDING)
> > CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --enable-xinerama
> > .endif
>
> Ok, that's the kind of feedback I need. :) You said you tried, did it
> succeed? :)
Ah, yes it indeed compiled successfully :)
> > and a patch to fix Qt based popup windows referenced here:
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2005-July/024661.html
> > and these worked so far.
>
> Sorry for my failure to understand you here. Are you saying that you tried
> that patch on an amd64 system and it worked for you? If so, (and my testing
> proves that it doesn't harm 32 bit platforms), then I have no objection to
> including it.
Yes. For example - before this patch using Kmail in Windowmaker and selecting
in menu Settings -> Configure Kmail... would result in configure window being
placed basically somewhere outside of anything (for quite some time I thought
Kmail was freezing); selecting it via middle click on root window brought it
back however. With this patch there are no more problems with misplaced
windows - the Configure window from example shows on top of desktop. I'm
running Windowmaker 0.92 on amd64 now with this patch and the above one that
made it compile successfully so I'd say include it please :)
Dejan
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list