mail/policyd name conflict

[Rong-En Fan]

On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 02:33:25PM +0100, Anton Berezin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 09:54:41AM -0300, Marcus Grando wrote:
> 
> > Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> > >I would call them
> > >    mail/postfix-policyd
> > >    mail/postfix-policyd-spf
> > 
> > mail/postfix-policyd-spf
> > mail/postfix-policyd-greylist
> > 
> > I like this.
> > 
> > After ports freeze, i send PR to change this.
> > 
> > But don't forget to change executable name. I change to policyd-spf and 
> > the new port change to policyd-greylist or something.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> \Anton.

Hello All,

While I'm preparing a new shar for version 1.49, it comes to my
mind that the name conflict things.

As 1.49, it does more things (a helo auto blacking is added), I would
like to have 

mail/postfix-policyd-spf (the original mail/policyd)
mail/postfix-policyd

since greylisting is only part of it. As mentioned before, mail/sqlgrey
and mail/postgrey, will them changed to

mail/postfix-policyd-sqlgrey
mail/postfix-policyd-postgrey

A bit long name? If in this case, I would suggest that we don't
touch them and just rename mail/policyd to mail/policyd-spf
and the new one will be mail/policyd (just google policyd, it is
in the second result).

If there is no further problem, I would like to send this rename
pr and policyd 1.49 shar :-)

Regards,
Rong-En Fan