HEADS UP - master/slave ports

[Dan Langille]

On 17 Jun 2004 at 23:05, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:

> Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
> 
> >> These appear to be slightly faster than the previous stats I posted.
> >> Everything is pratically identical in user time.  sys is where the
> >> savings are being made.
> >
> > it's strange that this code (w/ no fork) is not much faster than 2 
> > forks !
> 
> The benchmark is not really valid. Depending on your machine,
> nearly everything will be in the cache. This is not true when
> you have other stuff in the loop, like building the INDEX.

Agreed.  There are now a number of options to test under load and 
under the actual conditions they will be used.
-- 
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
BSDCan - http://www.bsdcan.org/