HEADS UP - master/slave ports
Roman Neuhauser
neuhauser at chello.cz
Thu Jun 17 13:05:18 GMT 2004
# dan at langille.org / 2004-06-17 08:44:13 -0400:
> On 17 Jun 2004 at 14:28, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > Ugh, I see; I was confusing this with another feature... That
> > would make it
> >
> > _REALPORTSDIR!= ${REALPATH} "${PORTSDIR}"
> > _REALMASTERDIR!= ${REALPATH} "${MASTERDIR}"
> > MASTERPORT= ${_REALMASTERDIR:S,^${_REALPORTSDIR}/,,}
>
> That's better:
>
> [dan at polo:~/ports/www/mod_php4] $ make -V MASTERPORT -f ./Makefile
> PORTSDIR=~/ports LOCALBASE=/nonexistentlocal X11BASE=/nonexistentx
> lang/php4
>
> > and I'm not sure that's any better than what you had originally.
>
> Why do you think that?
Because I don't know whether two /bin/realpath calls are cheaper
than one /usr/bin/sed.
> > But, what will both versions output in databases/mysql40-client?
>
> Both output the same thing:
Ah, sure, ${MASTERDIR} was passed through realpath in both versions.
So, remaining differences are perhaps speed, readability, and more
than one level of categories. The first hasn't been measured, the
second is a subjective thing, and the last is ATM a purely
theoretical concern.
Sorry for the noise.
--
If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore
your message. see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list