HEADS UP: change in ports rc.d script behaviour

[Michael Nottebrock]

On Saturday 24 July 2004 21:35, Tobias Roth wrote:

> and it's not  mikes responsibility to fix every port this breaks.

I fail to see why src committers need not take responsibility for breaking 
ports and help fixing them, especially if they're told beforehand during 
review that their changes will break ports.

Mtm seems to have pretty specific ideas about how to fix them, too, so it 
shouldn't take him much time at all to send-pr some diffs so the respective 
port-maintainers can review and approve them. Ideally, those PRs should have 
been sent, reviewed and committed to ports _before_ committing to src, but 
it's obviously too late for that now.

-- 
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi at freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20040725/e3d428b7/attachment.bin