Feature Request: /usr/local/etc/rc.conf support
Ted Cabeen
ted at impulse.net
Thu Feb 19 13:57:44 PST 2004
"slave-mike" <slave-mike at slavepix.com> writes:
> as /et/rc.conf is sourced as a shell script archive could one
> put something like ...
>
> if [ -x /usr/local/etc/rc..conf ]; then
> . /usr/local/etc/rc.conf
> fi
>
> in /etc/rc.conf ???
That would work, but you would still have the overriding important
settings problem.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Doug White" <dwhite at gumbysoft.com>
> To: "Ted Cabeen" <secabeen at pobox.com>
> Cc: <freebsd-current at freebsd.org>; <freebsd-ports at freebsd.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 9:10 PM
> Subject: Re: Feature Request: /usr/local/etc/rc.conf support
>
>
>> On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Ted Cabeen wrote:
>>
>> > With the ever-increasing number of ports that use rc.conf variables to
>> > regulate their startup, would it be possible to add support for a
>> > /usr/local/etc/rc.conf file in FreeBSD? The constant changes to the
>> > rc.conf file have been playing havoc with my centralized management
>> > systems, and it makes it harder and harder to keep the /etc/rc.conf
>> > file set immutable (which I like to do on critical servers, to prevent
>> > the securelevel from changing).
>>
>> I keep wanting to suggest using the already-existent /etc/rc.conf.local,
>> but now that you mention that you want to lock out changes to stuff like
>> securelevel, it makes more sense why you'd want to split it off.
>>
>> --
>> Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
>> dwhite at gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-current at freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>>
>
>
--
Ted Cabeen
Sr. Systems/Network Administrator
Impulse Internet Services
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list