[Bug 243309] sysutils/dirvish erroneously marked BROKEN unfetchable
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
Mon May 4 17:56:37 UTC 2020
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243309
Chris Hutchinson <portmaster at bsdforge.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |portmaster at bsdforge.com
--- Comment #9 from Chris Hutchinson <portmaster at bsdforge.com> ---
OK this has gone on *way* too long.
Here's what I've discovered:
tar tvf freebsd-copy/dirvish-1.2.1.tgz dirvish-copy/dirvish-1.2.1.tgz
freebsd-copy
-rw-rw-r-- 0 keithl keithl 39118 Mar 25 2008 CHANGELOG
-rw-rw-r-- 0 keithl keithl 9910 Mar 25 2008 COPYING
-rw-rw-r-- 0 keithl keithl 8140 Mar 25 2008 dirvish.8
-rw-rw-r-- 0 keithl keithl 21480 Mar 25 2008 dirvish.conf.5
-rw-rw-r-- 0 keithl keithl 3387 Mar 25 2008 dirvish-expire.8
-rw-rw-r-- 0 keithl keithl 5656 Mar 25 2008 dirvish-expire.pl
-rw-rw-r-- 0 keithl keithl 3060 Mar 25 2008 dirvish-locate.8
-rw-rw-r-- 0 keithl keithl 5413 Mar 25 2008 dirvish-locate.pl
-rw-rw-r-- 0 keithl keithl 23385 Mar 25 2008 dirvish.pl
-rw-rw-r-- 0 keithl keithl 2350 Mar 25 2008 dirvish-runall.8
-rw-rw-r-- 0 keithl keithl 3084 Mar 25 2008 dirvish-runall.pl
-rw-rw-r-- 0 keithl keithl 21481 Mar 25 2008 FAQ.html
-rw-rw-r-- 0 keithl keithl 3426 Mar 25 2008 INSTALL
-rwxrwxr-x 0 keithl keithl 3894 Mar 25 2008 install.sh
-rw-rw-r-- 0 keithl keithl 5038 Mar 25 2008 loadconfig.pl
-rw-rw-r-- 0 keithl keithl 1059 Mar 25 2008 RELEASE.html
-rw-rw-r-- 0 keithl keithl 6897 Mar 25 2008 TODO.html
dirvish-copy
drwxr-xr-x 0 root root 0 Jan 6 2012 dirvish-1.2.1/
-rw-rw-r-- 0 postgrey postgrey 23385 Mar 25 2008 dirvish-1.2.1/dirvish.pl
-rw-rw-r-- 0 postgrey postgrey 3426 Mar 25 2008 dirvish-1.2.1/INSTALL
-rw-rw-r-- 0 postgrey postgrey 3387 Mar 25 2008
dirvish-1.2.1/dirvish-expire.8
-rw-rw-r-- 0 postgrey postgrey 5038 Mar 25 2008 dirvish-1.2.1/loadconfig.pl
-rw-rw-r-- 0 postgrey postgrey 5413 Mar 25 2008
dirvish-1.2.1/dirvish-locate.pl
-rw-rw-r-- 0 postgrey postgrey 8140 Mar 25 2008 dirvish-1.2.1/dirvish.8
-rw-rw-r-- 0 postgrey postgrey 3084 Mar 25 2008
dirvish-1.2.1/dirvish-runall.pl
-rw-rw-r-- 0 postgrey postgrey 21481 Mar 25 2008 dirvish-1.2.1/FAQ.html
-rw-rw-r-- 0 postgrey postgrey 39118 Mar 25 2008 dirvish-1.2.1/CHANGELOG
-rw-rw-r-- 0 postgrey postgrey 9910 Mar 25 2008 dirvish-1.2.1/COPYING
-rw-rw-r-- 0 postgrey postgrey 6897 Mar 25 2008 dirvish-1.2.1/TODO.html
-rw-rw-r-- 0 postgrey postgrey 5656 Mar 25 2008
dirvish-1.2.1/dirvish-expire.pl
-rw-rw-r-- 0 postgrey postgrey 2350 Mar 25 2008
dirvish-1.2.1/dirvish-runall.8
-rw-rw-r-- 0 postgrey postgrey 1059 Mar 25 2008 dirvish-1.2.1/RELEASE.html
-rw-rw-r-- 0 postgrey postgrey 21480 Jan 6 2012 dirvish-1.2.1/dirvish.conf.5
-rw-rw-r-- 0 postgrey postgrey 3060 Mar 25 2008
dirvish-1.2.1/dirvish-locate.8
-rwxrwxr-x 0 postgrey postgrey 3894 Mar 25 2008 dirvish-1.2.1/install.sh
As we can see. There are only 2 differences
1) the copy from dirvish.org adds the dirvish-1.2.1 directory
2) dirvish.conf.5 was changed on 2012-01-06
OK, 3; the group and owner are different.
Lets see what's different about dirvish.conf.5
--- freebsd-copy/dirvish.conf.5 2008-03-25 08:35:43.000000000 -0700
+++ dirvish-copy/dirvish-1.2.1/dirvish.conf.5 2012-01-06 19:26:00.000000000
-0800
@@ -786,7 +786,7 @@
.ta +.5i +36m
wd { sun } +3 months
wd { sun } md { 1\-7 } +1 year
- wd { 1 } md { 1\-7 } mo { 1,4,7,10 } never
+ wd { 1 } md { 1\-7 } mo { 1 4 7 10 } never
hr { 10\-20 } +10 days
.ft R
.fi
CLEARLY the difference in the official copy from dirvish.org won't
be injecting any virii, or backdoor. It only affects (corrects) the
dirvish.conf(5) man(1) page.
The proposed svn diff provided by Nathan tested fine on my 12 && 13
amd64 boxes.
Given that this port is on the chopping block.
Can we *please* commit Nathan work? :)
Thanks!
--Chris
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs
mailing list