[Bug 252013] [NEW PORT] net-p2p/airdcpp-webclient: <A web based DC++ client>
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
Mon Dec 21 12:05:52 UTC 2020
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252013
Bug ID: 252013
Summary: [NEW PORT] net-p2p/airdcpp-webclient: <A web based
DC++ client>
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affects Only Me
Priority: ---
Component: Individual Port(s)
Assignee: ports-bugs at FreeBSD.org
Reporter: ven1m at protonmail.com
Created attachment 220776
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=220776&action=edit
patch
net-p2p/airdcpp-webclient: <New port, initial commit>
* Added custom rc.d to control service.
* User and group airdcpp is created in order to avoid to run the service as
root.
Some things to consider when reviewing the port:
* Built as one package with both client and web UI in one package. Is this OK
and could be split later on if this should be needed? Can be split according to
https://airdcpp-web.github.io/docs/advanced/compiling-options.html
* etc/airdcpp/ is used for both config file, but also for all other files
created by the service. Should these have been located in share/airdcpp
instead? It includes a mix of config, log and client files. It is not possible
to split these as far as I know.
* Could tbb be added to default options in order to be used when official
packages are created, or should it be kept as a non-default option?
QA:
* portlint: OK (WARN: Makefile: possible use of absolute pathname "/var".)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs
mailing list