[Bug 225059] mail/*notmuch: update to 0.26
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
Tue Feb 27 05:02:27 UTC 2018
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225059
--- Comment #5 from commit-hook at freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: fluffy
Date: Tue Feb 27 05:01:30 UTC 2018
New revision: 463108
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/463108
Log:
- Pass maintainership of mail/notmuch and mail/py-notmuch to submitter.
- Update ports to version to 0.26.
- Unconditionally install completions according to Porter's Handbook Chapter
6.31.
without adding extra dependencies.
- Turn on the MANPAGES option by default. Building the manual pages is kept
as an option
to allow for more minimal custom builds.
- Remove RUBY option as it never did anything. There are no build or install
instructions
in the Makefile nor %%RUBY%% references in pkg-plist.
Building with the RUBY option enabled makes absolutely no difference to
the produced package.
The only thing ever requiring the Ruby bindings to the Notmuch library is
the Vim client,
which isn't built either.
- Turn mail/py-notmuch into a slave port of mail/notmuch.
- Split off EMACS option into the flavor aware slave port mail/notmuch-emacs.
- Split off MUTT option into the slave port mail/notmuch-mutt.
- Perform miscellaneous cleanups.
PR: 225059
Submitted by: seschwar AT gmail.com
Reviewed by: mat, fluffy, maintainers
Approved by: maintainers
Differential Revision: D13944
Changes:
head/mail/Makefile
head/mail/notmuch/Makefile
head/mail/notmuch/distinfo
head/mail/notmuch/files/
head/mail/notmuch/pkg-descr
head/mail/notmuch/pkg-plist
head/mail/notmuch-emacs/
head/mail/notmuch-emacs/Makefile
head/mail/notmuch-emacs/pkg-descr
head/mail/notmuch-emacs/pkg-plist
head/mail/notmuch-mutt/
head/mail/notmuch-mutt/Makefile
head/mail/notmuch-mutt/pkg-descr
head/mail/notmuch-mutt/pkg-plist
head/mail/py-notmuch/Makefile
head/mail/py-notmuch/distinfo
head/mail/py-notmuch/pkg-descr
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs
mailing list