[Bug 212465] lang/gcc49: Fix build with libc++ 3.9.0
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
Wed Sep 7 21:29:45 UTC 2016
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212465
Bug ID: 212465
Summary: lang/gcc49: Fix build with libc++ 3.9.0
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affects Some People
Priority: ---
Component: Individual Port(s)
Assignee: gerald at FreeBSD.org
Reporter: dim at FreeBSD.org
Assignee: gerald at FreeBSD.org
Flags: maintainer-feedback?(gerald at FreeBSD.org)
Created attachment 174492
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=174492&action=edit
Include <new> in gcc/system.h
While testing the clang390-import branch, I ran into the following errors
building lang/gcc49:
In file included from
/wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/gcc49/work/gcc-4.9.4/gcc/c/c-objc-common.c:33:
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/new:70:
/usr/include/c++/v1/exception:267:5: error: no member named 'fancy_abort' in
namespace 'std::__1'; did you mean simply 'fancy_abort'?
_VSTD::abort();
^~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/v1/__config:451:15: note: expanded from macro '_VSTD'
#define _VSTD std::_LIBCPP_NAMESPACE
^
/wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/gcc49/work/gcc-4.9.4/gcc/system.h:685:13: note:
'fancy_abort' declared here
extern void fancy_abort (const char *, int, const char *) ATTRIBUTE_NORETURN;
^
1 error generated.
What is happening here, is that the source file includes gcc/system.h, which
defines abort to fancy_abort, and then the source file includes <new>, which
attempts to call _VSTD::abort() (the _VSTD is a libc++ alias for std::). The
macro definition then causes the above breakage.
Newer gcc ports, such as gcc5 and gcc6 don't show this issue, because upstream
gcc first added an include of <algorithm> (which indirectly includes <new>) in
r217348 [1], and later even add a direct include of <new> in r232736 [2].
I propose to fix it for this version, by adding the direct include of <new> to
gcc/system.h. This makes the 'second' includes of <new> in some .c files
superfluous, but it's less churn.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=217348
[2] https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=232736
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs
mailing list