[Bug 209556] security/pinentry
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
Mon May 16 16:17:01 UTC 2016
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209556
Bug ID: 209556
Summary: security/pinentry
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affects Only Me
Priority: ---
Component: Individual Port(s)
Assignee: makc at FreeBSD.org
Reporter: nolden at kde.org
Assignee: makc at FreeBSD.org
Flags: maintainer-feedback?(makc at FreeBSD.org)
Created attachment 170368
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=170368&action=edit
svn diff against ports HEAD for pinentry and pinentry-qt5
Request: add a pinentry-qt5 frontent for pinentry with the according port added
and the pinentry port updated.
Until now, pinentry only provides a Qt 4 interface although a Qt 5 version is
doable. I added the according options and used the suffix configure option to
rename the qt4 version binary to pinentry-qt4 and use suffix=5 for naming the
Qt 5 version pinentry-qt5 to avoid collisions.
As freshports.org doesn't show any dependencies on the pinentry-qt4 port that
would require additional measures for the name change of the provided file
(pinentry-qt to pinentry-qt4), I assume it is safe to just rename the binary,
see
https://www.freshports.org/security/pinentry-qt4/
The update covers:
- additional Qt5 option to the pinentry port with the according changes
required for building with either Qt4 or Qt5 together with Qt5 dependencies
- new port "pinentry-qt5" which is basically a copy of the pinentry-qt4 port
updated for Qt5.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs
mailing list